Leveraging Technology to Advance Youth Apprenticeship

Brief
Shutterstock
April 10, 2024

Trident Technical College had a challenge.

After several years of hard work and experimentation, its youth apprenticeship partnership—Charleston Regional Youth Apprenticeships (CRYA)—was rapidly growing, attracting an increasing number of new apprentices and employers each year. But expansion also brought new hurdles, including the need for better tools to track data on apprentices’ work experience, on-the-job training, and related instruction.

Trident’s Dean of Apprenticeships and Employer Partnerships, Mitch Harp, thought about his wish list. He wanted to create a portable, easy-to-use resource to help apprentices track their progress. He aspired to ensure that all of CRYA’s key partners—employers, K–12 teachers and counselors, and Trident staff—could access students’ data so they could monitor their progress and provide support as needed. And, ideally, he hoped to reduce the burden of data collection so that it would be easier for Trident’s staff to compile reports for funders and other stakeholders.

As he brainstormed solutions, a new idea was sparked: “We’re going to build an app!”

Managing a youth apprenticeship program is a highly complex venture that requires careful planning, coordination, data sharing, and communication with a diverse group of stakeholders. In light of this demanding operating context, a growing number of organizations are seeking technology solutions to help them manage their youth apprenticeships more effectively and efficiently. Yet, given the still-nascent state of youth apprenticeship, there is limited awareness of the options available to programs, much less any standardization or consensus about the most promising tools and technologies.

Noting a growing number of inquiries from programs seeking guidance on the selection of technology products, the Partnership to Advance Youth Apprenticeship (PAYA) launched a study in fall 2023 to document the state of technology adoption across the field of youth apprenticeship and strengthen our understanding of the current landscape. New America researchers surveyed youth apprenticeship programs from our national network of 70+ partners, held follow-up interviews with 11 programs, conducted online research, and collected information from several vendors. This summary of our findings describes why youth apprenticeship programs seek out technology solutions, outlines how technology use varies among programs, lists considerations for making information technology (IT) purchases, discusses common barriers to technology adoption, and explores opportunities to better leverage technology to strengthen and scale up youth apprenticeship programs.

Why Technology?

Youth apprenticeship programs are implemented through multi-stakeholder partnerships that include K–12 schools, postsecondary institutions, employers, and community partners who are supported by a backbone organization known as an apprenticeship intermediary. As summarized in a 2019 report by PAYA partner Education Strategy Group, intermediaries fulfill a range of roles and functions that help to ensure the success of a youth apprenticeship program as depicted in Figure 1 below:

Figure 1

| Intermediaries Provide Services across the Work-Based Learning Spectrum

Source: The Critical Role of Intermediary Organizations in Expanding Youth Apprenticeship, Education Strategy Group, 2019

The youth apprenticeship intermediaries that contributed to our study reported seeking technology solutions to manage many of these core responsibilities, particularly tasks related to:

  • Applicant tracking and management;
  • Youth apprentice case management;
  • Employer prospecting and relationship management;
  • Partner and apprentice communications;
  • Work process and competency tracking;
  • On-the-job training (OJT) tracking;
  • Related training and instruction tracking; and
  • Reporting and compliance.

More generally, intermediaries also noted an interest in using technology to realize efficiencies that extend limited staff capacity; provide quick-reference insights into program operations (e.g., dashboards); improve documentation of activities and outcomes; reduce the burden of and increase the accuracy of data tracking; and automate repetitive processes.

Small and Early-Stage Programs Keep It Simple

Not surprisingly, the types of tools and technologies youth apprenticeship intermediaries use vary significantly, depending on the size of the program and the stage of its development. Small-scale and recently launched youth apprenticeship programs reported that their operations are relatively low tech, often relying heavily on spreadsheets to manage data and information.

For example, education nonprofit Reach Higher Montana’s small but growing program, Montana Youth Apprenticeship Partnership, supports 23 youth apprentices across the state, partnering with five employers in the health care, IT, maintenance, accounting, and early childhood education sectors. Reach Higher Montana uses a collection of relatively low-tech, low-cost tools—such as Excel spreadsheets and Google Docs—to track employer engagement, outreach, apprentice work processes, and demographics. While generally satisfied with these tools, staff members reported that, in anticipation of continued growth, they’ve begun to seek out new software to help better document and manage their interactions with employers and apprentices. They hope that new tools will allow them to reduce their reliance on person-to-person transmission of information and strengthen institutional memory. Staff emphasized that any consideration of new tools will be shaped by budgetary constraints and potential limitations in the level of technical support required to launch and maintain them.

Growing Programs Seek Specialized Applications

As youth apprenticeship programs scale up, growing operational demands—like the need to manage larger volumes of data or maximize efficiency so they can stretch staff capacity—often lead intermediaries to adopt new tools and technologies. The technology needs of mid-sized intermediaries in our study were extensive, and participants reported that they used as many as nine applications to manage their programs. Commonly cited tools included:

  • Business productivity tools like the project management platforms Monday and Asana to coordinate activity across partners;
  • Customer relationship management (CRM) tools like Salesforce, ZenDesk, Hubspot, Zoho, Dynamix, Microsoft Dynamics, and Pipedrive to track and manage relationships with employers and other key partners;
  • Electronic signature software like E-Trieve, DocuSign, and Adobe Sign for memoranda of understanding, apprenticeship agreements, and application submissions;
  • Learning management software (LMS) like Xello, Litmus, and Tovuti to deliver instruction and monitor apprentices’ completion of required training;
  • Survey management platforms like Qualtrics for gathering data; and
  • Data management, analysis, and visualization tools like Airtable, DataWrapper, and Microsoft PowerBI to handle data needs that exceed the capabilities of basic spreadsheet applications.

Some tech-enabled programs also reported creative repurposing of off-the-shelf products. For example, one intermediary noted that it has deployed Breezy HR, a human resources employee recruiting software product, to manage its apprenticeship application process.

Indianapolis-based workforce board EmployIndy is typical of intermediaries at this stage of development. Launched in 2020, its Modern Apprenticeship Program began with a two-person staff managing a few dozen apprentices and blossomed into a team of 15 that coordinates 100+ youth apprentices, 12 K–12 partners, and 36 employers across industries that include business operations, IT, construction, and health care. EmployIndy has adopted an assortment of tools to achieve its program management goals, including:

  • Monday and Asana for project management;
  • Microsoft Dynamics for CRM and case management;
  • Tovuti—a learning management system that also delivers custom training modules—for tracking competencies and related instruction; and
  • AirTable—a cloud-based database—to exchange information with K–12 partners about student academic progress.

To strengthen day-to-day program management, EmployIndy is working to build out a dashboard using the data visualization tool Microsoft Power BI.

Large-Scale, Innovative Intermediaries Are Developing Custom Solutions

Like the CRYA experience described in the introduction, several of the larger, more experienced youth apprenticeship intermediaries in PAYA’s network identified specific technology needs as their programs grew, prompting them to develop customized technology solutions.

Launched in 2013, CRYA has grown from a small pilot supporting 13 apprentices to a regional talent development engine that serves 200 apprentices and 180 employers across a range of industries. CRYA engaged a software developer to create an app—My Apprentice—to help apprentices understand their program requirements and track and communicate their progress. The app is accessible on mobile devices and the web, allowing apprentices, employers, CRYA staff, and other stakeholders to stay up-to-date on time-sensitive action items. Created with financial support from PAYA, My Apprentice was developed as an open-source application that can be customized and deployed by any youth apprenticeship program.

Ascend Indiana is an initiative of Central Indiana Corporate Partnership, an organization that brings together industry, higher education, and philanthropic leaders to advance regional prosperity and growth. In 2019, Ascend launched a new youth-focused strategy that featured a collaboration with EmployIndy to launch the Modern Apprenticeship Program pilot; a network of youth apprenticeship pilots across the state called the Indiana Youth Apprenticeship Accelerator; and a statewide community of practice that engages more than 100 members and 60 organizations to address systemic barriers to scaling up modern youth apprenticeship across Indiana. Ascend’s statewide network has grown to include 500+ youth apprentices, 50+ employers, and 30+ schools.

To support its youth apprenticeship partners throughout the state, Ascend Indiana has provided them with access to the Ascend Network, a proprietary job-matching platform created to support the organization’s broader workforce development efforts. The Ascend Network facilitates the matching of potential apprentices to employers by allowing youth to create a profile and employers to share information about apprenticeship opportunities.

Founded in 2016 and launching its first cohort in 2017, CareerWise USA has seen more than 2,000 apprentices hired by more than 250 employers. Its growing network includes affiliates in Colorado, Indiana, New York, and Washington, DC. To support this network, CareerWise developed a customized suite of applications built on or integrated with Salesforce. The suite includes both custom and off-the-shelf technology tools. The custom tools include the Apprenticeship Hiring Hub (an applicant tracking system), a performance management system, related instruction tracking platform, and a grant-reporting program that reformats data for uploading to federal systems like the Workforce Integrated Performance System (WIPS). It has also integrated an enterprise learning management system (LMS) and a communications platform into its Salesforce suite. It uses Docebo LMS for its Learning and Resource Hub to customize learning plans for apprentices based on occupation. CareerWise programs use Marketing Cloud to send emails throughout the apprenticeship process, pulse checks to see how apprentices are doing, and event reminders. Alex Peek, CareerWise’s Director of Technology, stresses that the most important part of the technology suite is that there is one source of truth for everything, which is Salesforce, so the organization can easily pull data to measure the program across its network.

Local affiliates are able to use the CareerWise technology suite to help manage their programs. This allows new, smaller programs access to more advanced technology than they would typically use at that stage, hopefully paving the way for faster expansion. However, CareerWise has found that, despite the program model standardization that comes with being a CareerWise affiliate, there is still a large degree of customization required for each local program.

There Is Growing Interest in Apprenticeship Management Systems

Finally, a number of study participants expressed interest in specialized apprenticeship management systems (AMS). Examples of these platforms include:

Apprenticeship Tracker ApprenTrac myOneFlow
ApprentiScope BuildWithin Symba
Apprentix GoSprout WorkHands

There is an even broader range of AMS products available from companies in Australia and the United Kingdom. Examples include ACE360, Aptem, ARODS, Bud, epaPro, ePortfolio, EOSONE, HEIApply, Mykademy, Olive VLE, TradeSchool, Tribal, and Ready Apprentice. However, differences between U.S. and international apprenticeship models (e.g., end point assessments, variations in standards, etc.) will likely render some of these products less well aligned with the needs of American youth apprenticeship programs.

Several AMS vendors responded to a request for information (RFI) distributed by PAYA in fall 2023. Some of the apprenticeship-specific capabilities they reported for AMS products include:

  • Recruitment and apprenticeship placement tools;
  • Apprenticeship standard libraries and templates;
  • Wage progression schedules and tracking;
  • Online training options, sometimes through integrations with an LMS;
  • Work hour, related instruction, and OJT tracking;
  • Evaluations and assessments;
  • Specialized dashboards and reports; and
  • Tools to support compliance with U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL) Registered Apprenticeship Partners Information Database System (RAPIDS), WIPS, and Participant Individual Record Layout reporting requirements.

Two PAYA grantees recently adopted one of these platforms, but reported that they were too early in their deployment to draw any conclusions about their usefulness or share lessons learned. A number of other study participants reported that they were interested in these products but—in light of the significant financial investment required to deploy them—were hesitant to consider them more seriously without feedback from peers about their usefulness and return on investment.

Technology Planning Considerations

Given the complex landscape of technology products that youth apprenticeship intermediaries must navigate, programs will want to take the following factors into consideration when selecting products.

Program Needs

  • What is the problem you’re trying to solve with technology?
  • Have you clarified and prioritized your functional requirements with input from all key stakeholders?
  • How much do you anticipate your program will grow in the next one, three, or five years? How will growth impact your needs?
  • When you take stock of the capacity of all staff involved in apprenticeship management, where is bandwidth limited? Can you free up staff time by automating manual, repetitive, or time-consuming tasks?

User Needs

  • Who needs to have access to the product? Who needs to collaborate and share information in order for youth apprentices to thrive?
  • How sophisticated are the technical skills of likely users?
  • Where will these users operate? At a desk? School? Worksite?
  • What devices will they use? Laptops? Tablets? Mobile devices?

Procurement Considerations

  • Do you have the expertise to select a product on your own, or will you need to engage a consultant to guide you?
  • Does your organization have procurement policies that you will need to comply with?
  • Can the product be fully implemented within your budget and timeline?

Compatibility, Privacy, and Security Requirements

  • Is the product compatible with the tools your organization already depends on?
  • What integrations are available with other products?
  • Are there data privacy or security requirements you need to comply with? Will the product meet the requirements of partners who are subject to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and other limitations on data sharing?
  • Can the product be safely used by minors?

IT Support Requirements

  • What will it take to set up and deploy the product?
  • Is the product easy to learn and use?
  • Do you have IT staff available to help you set up and maintain the product?
  • How much ongoing maintenance is required?
  • Is the product still supported by the manufacturer?

Budget Constraints and Value Considerations

  • What is your budget?
  • Can you secure additional resources to support setup and maintenance?
  • How will you assess return on investment? Are there cost savings that can be realized by consolidating a collection of tools into a single integrated system or in freeing up staff time?
  • What are the direct (e.g., subscription fees) and indirect (e.g., related equipment upgrades) costs of ownership?
  • How does the product compare to similar offerings from competitors?

Barriers to Leveraging Digital Tools and Solutions

While recognizing that software tools offered alluring opportunities for increasing their efficiency and effectiveness, youth apprenticeship intermediaries nevertheless reported that they faced significant hurdles to more fully realizing technologies’ potential.

Procurement and Cost Challenges

  • Difficulty juggling multiple IT tools that don’t always work well together
  • Cost-prohibitive product pricing or restrictive grant terms that can make it difficult for programs to acquire desired technologies

Internal Technical Limits

  • Lack of internal expertise to identify and select software and to locate external experts to assess needs and recommend technology solutions
  • Concerns about complexity, including the level of technical support required to deploy and maintain IT solutions as well as the level of technological sophistication required for end-users to successfully use them

Regulations and Requirements

  • Complex and sometimes bureaucratic procurement policies that limit options and delay deployment of new software, particularly for intermediaries housed within large public education institutions
  • Organizational privacy and security requirements
  • Complex data sharing laws, regulations, and institutional policies that can thwart timely and transparent information sharing among partners

There are also supply-side barriers. The structure and operation of youth apprenticeship programs tend to vary significantly from place to place. A community college may serve as the youth apprenticeship intermediary in one community, while a small nonprofit might serve as the intermediary in another. One program might register apprenticeships through the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Apprenticeship, while another registers them via a state apprenticeship agency.

As a result of this variability, a technology solution that helps one youth apprenticeship program excel may have to be significantly modified to meet the needs of another community. Offering this level of place-to-place customization makes it difficult to realize economies of scale. This potentially drives up the price of software and cuts into the profits of developers, potentially creating a disincentive to develop additional products targeted towards youth apprenticeship programs.

Towards a Tech-Enabled Future

“Organizations that are tech-enabled, or are striving to become so, continually try to improve the way they do business. By testing and integrating tools and solutions that streamline operations and services and making it easier for everyone to access the workforce system, they are redefining success for their organizations, their communities, and the people they interact with every day.”Tech-Enabled: Using New Tools to Build Better Organizations

Policymakers, funders, national thought leaders, and researchers all have a role to play in helping more youth apprenticeship intermediaries identify and deploy digital tools and solutions that improve efficiency, strengthen communication, bolster data management, and increase effectiveness. Four high-potential strategies include:

Investigate the Return on Investment for Technology Tools

As is frequently the case, our research raised as many questions as it answered:

  • Does investing in technology produce efficiencies that free up staff time for more value-additive activities or allow programs to scale up more rapidly?
  • Do user-friendly technology tools improve data quality for reporting?
  • Can technology solutions make apprenticeship management easier for employers and, by extension, promote adoption by more businesses?
  • Are there specific apprenticeship management system features that offer a greater return on investment than others?

Additional research into apprenticeship technology solutions would provide better guidance to the field and help to ensure that technology investments are deployed strategically. Our study also unearthed several interesting examples of apprenticeship technology outside the United States, including a joint effort by several Canadian provinces to develop a custom apprenticeship management system to coordinate efforts across apprentices, journeypersons, employers, training providers, and government apprenticeship management staff. Based on this example and our quick scan of products used in the United Kingdom and Australia, it seems likely that further exploration of lessons learned by international peers could also yield valuable insights.

Ensure Ready Access to Expertise

Philanthropic funders and government leaders can also help to ensure that apprenticeship programs make smart technology investments by facilitating access to expert technical assistance providers who can help intermediaries assess their needs and requirements and then provide objective guidance to help them select high-quality products.

Provide Leadership and Support for Innovation

A recent report on apprenticeship registration from Apprenticeships for America hailed the usefulness of USDOL’s Office of Apprenticeship’s web-based Standards Builder, noting that program leaders found it was valuable “both because it makes needed forms and documents accessible and because registrations can be filed electronically and quickly revised if needed.” USDOL and other public agencies can build on this win and leverage their resources and influence to further advance the adoption of technology tools, particularly by working to ensure that public data systems like RAPIDS and WIPS allow for interoperability with solutions created by third-party developers.

Clarify Policies about Funding for Infrastructure

Finally, many apprenticeship programs cited funding as a significant barrier to investing in more sophisticated technology solutions. Public and philanthropic funders can help to address this barrier by:

  • Providing clear guidance on the types of technology investments that are allowable under specific funding opportunities;
  • Nudging apprenticeship programs to think ahead about their technology needs through specific prompts in funding proposals and budgets; and
  • Providing funding opportunities that invest in new technology tools and evaluate their utility.

Looking Ahead

As youth apprenticeship programs grow and evolve, many are turning to technology tools and solutions to help them manage increasingly complex operations, maximize limited staff capacity, and strengthen partnerships. However, apprenticeship intermediaries face hurdles, ranging from tight budgets to bureaucratic procurement policies, that can inhibit adoption of new technologies. Looking forward, expanded research, expert guidance, supportive public policies, and strategic investments can help youth apprenticeship programs overcome these barriers and leverage technology to achieve new levels of efficiency, effectiveness, and scale. If used strategically, technology tools offer significant potential to strengthen data use, streamline administration, enhance alignment among partners, and expand opportunities for youth. With thoughtful planning and support, technology solutions can play an invaluable role in helping apprenticeship intermediaries deliver high-quality programs at scale.

It’s taken Mitch and the rest of the CRYA team a decade to grow their program from 13 apprentices to over 200. Many foundations and governments have significantly more ambitious hopes for the speed that youth apprenticeship programs will grow over the next 10 years. California has a goal to reach 500,000 apprentices by 2029, a significant number of which they hope to be youth apprentices. Maryland’s comprehensive school reform bill, the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future, calls for increasing the number of high schoolers in apprenticeship to 60,000 in seven years. For these hopes to be realized, technology will need to play a central role. Policymakers, funders, thought leaders, and researchers can accelerate adoption of key technologies by equipping youth apprenticeship intermediaries with additional information, guidance, and resources.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the following Partnership to Advance Youth Apprenticeship (PAYA) Network members and apprenticeship technology industry representatives for their time and support in the creation of this report:

  • Trevor Aulick, Vice President, myOneFlow by Empyra.com, Inc.
  • Jason Butcher, Outreach Director, Reach Higher Montana
  • Kelly Cresswell, Executive Director, Reach Higher Montana
  • Miranda Cripe, CareerWise Elkhart County Partnership Manager, Horizon Education Alliance
  • Debbie Cromwell, Director of Work-Based Learning and Apprenticeships, Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College
  • Patrick Cushing, Founder, WorkHands
  • Heidi Erpelding-Welch, Chief Program Office, TechImpact
  • Mitchell Harp, Dean of Apprenticeship Programs, Trident Technical College
  • Sean Kelly, Assistant Principal and Career Development & Industry Liaison, Dennis Technical Education Center
  • Pam Knapp, Director of College and Career Readiness, San Joaquin County Office of Education
  • William Lippolis, Founder & CEO, ApprentiScope, Inc.
  • Marianne Para, Apprenticeship Program Specialist, San Joaquin County Office of Education
  • Alex Peek, Director of Technology, CareerWise USA
  • Betsy Revell, Senior Vice President of Career-Connected Learning, EmployIndy
  • Yolanda Scott, Central Oklahoma Workforce Innovation Board
  • Andy Seth, CEO, Apprentix
  • Melissa Stowasser, Assistant Vice President of Community Partnerships, Trident Technical College
  • John Wickert, Director, CTE and STEM Initiatives, Delaware Department of Education

References in this paper to any specific commercial product, process, or service, or the use of any trade, firm, or corporation name is for the information and convenience of the public, and does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by New America or PAYA.

PAYA’s work is made possible through the generous financial support of the Annie E. Casey Foundation; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; Bloomberg Philanthropies; Carnegie Corporation of New York; JP Morgan Chase & Co.; Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. Foundation; Siemens Foundation; Smidt Foundation; and Walton Family Foundation. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of collaborators or the entities they represent.