America’s Winter of Political Discontent Could Spark a Democratic Spring

The first couple months of the Trump administration have been a harsh winter of discontent in American politics. We barely dodged a government shutdown, the president is issuing illegal orders, and we’re grappling with economic uncertainty. Yet, as winter inevitably turns into spring, will our democratic disaster turn into a moment of renewal?

Perhaps. History moves in cycles, and we might soon see not just a reactive resistance to a destructive government but also reforms that could revitalize our democratic institutions, both locally and nationally.

Democratic systems often become stuck, as we see in the United States, where our polarized two-party system is stuck in a hyper-partisan deadlock. But pressure builds beneath the surface, and change can happen suddenly. 

America might stand at such a moment now. Strain often precedes transformation—and the strains on the system are intense. The Trump administration is using executive power to intimidate the media, universities, the legal profession, and the courts, all enabled by Republicans in Congress. It is gutting the federal workforce. It is deporting legal permanent residents and attempting to terminate constitutionally guaranteed birthright citizenship. 

“The question isn’t whether change will come, but whether it will successfully tackle this [political] dysfunction.”

But opposition is emerging, seen in town halls and rallies across the nation, including the popular “Fighting Oligarchy” events organized by Senator Bernie Sanders (D-Vermont) and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). Economic anxiety, political corruption, and social division have created the perfect storm to topple established orders. America faces all three, with an economic and political system that disproportionately benefits the wealthiest. The question isn’t whether change will come, but whether it will successfully tackle this dysfunction.

Several factors will determine the outcome.

First, ideas matter. Clear, compelling alternatives, ready as the old system falters, will shape what emerges next. Second, organization matters. Groups that mobilize quickly during moments of flux gain decisive advantages. Third, narrative matters. Whoever defines what’s happening and why will shape the response.

Crucially, these transformative moments don’t follow neat, predictable paths. They often feature unexpected alliances, as groups with seemingly divergent interests find common cause against a failing system. They build through informal networks before becoming visible in formal politics. And they often start at state or local levels before spreading nationally.

So, in this moment, where should we focus our hopes and energy?

The path forward requires both grassroots momentum and structural reform. Movements can generate energy and set an agenda that people buy into. Then, democratic structures—reformed to work and, ideally, supported by the public—are necessary for lasting change. 

With that in mind, two complementary approaches could work in tandem to revitalize American democracy.

First, we need to rebuild local political organizing as a source of grassroots change. Our civic life today is too atomized and individualized. One reason why is that our primary political organizations, the parties, have given up on civic engagement. For decades, they’ve transformed into flimsy networks of donors, fundraisers, and advertising and messaging consultants. 

What if political parties rebuilt year-round presences in communities, instead of just harassing people for money during election season? Imagine Democratic or Republican clubs that host community events: days of service, discussion groups, student workshops, help for residents navigating government programs, and regular gatherings of friends and neighbors. These resources could make politics more relationship-based, rather than distant and abstract.

Is this crazy? Not really. Political parties once operated this way, before the hollowing out of local parties that began in the 1960s as a new generation of political activists challenged the old order, and a new generation of entrepreneurial politicians discovered television and direct communication. The old machines had problems, certainly. But they created a sense of belonging that people desperately need. 

Under our two-party system, Democrats and Republicans have carved the country into competing single-party territories, with little reason to invest in year-round community organizing beyond a fixation on beating the other side.

“Democratic systems often become stuck... but pressure builds beneath the surface, and change can happen suddenly.”

This is where democratic reforms become fundamental. Electoral reform can give us more and better parties, which would make the most of community organizing.

Specifically, we need proportional representation through multi-member districts instead of the current winner-take-all system. Having larger districts that each elect multiple representatives to Congress will make elections more fair and representative. For example, if your district elects five representatives and your party wins 40 percent of the vote, your party gets two seats, instead of being completely shut out by the majority party as currently happens in U.S. elections. Most established democracies already use this system successfully.

We also need more fusion voting, which allows multiple parties to endorse the same candidate while maintaining their distinct identities. This creates space for issue-focused parties to influence major parties without becoming spoilers who “steal” votes. New York and Connecticut already use this system. Kansas and New Jersey could be next.

Civil society organizations are building coalitions for these reforms at local and state levels. They can help shape the next stage of American life by offering real democratic alternatives that mobilize people and tell a different narrative about what our country could be. These reforms are concrete steps we can take now to kickstart renewal. More parties mean more entry points for citizens who feel unrepresented by the current binary system. More competition for these constituents’ attention, in turn, mobilizes more citizens, in more places. People engage in politics when something clear is at stake, when their vote matters, and when political organizations are actively empowering them to get involved. 

Perhaps this winter of our discontent contains the seeds of something better—if we have the wisdom to nurture them.

Follow The Thread! Subscribe to The Thread monthly newsletter to get the latest in policy, equity, and culture in your inbox.