The Rise of the Dynamic Welfare State

The American welfare state has been more malleable than its European counterparts. While this can be attributed to historical circumstances, adverse effects of social programs, notably public assistance and child welfare, are contributing factors. In recent decades, the private sector has become more influential in shaping American social welfare through demonstrations emerging from the nonprofit sector, the shaping of public philosophy by policy institutes, and the ability of corporate providers to conform policy to their preferences. In interaction, these reflect the emergence of a dynamic welfare state. In contrast to the classical welfare state, the emergence of what can be termed the dynamic welfare state highlights three themes: mobility, empowerment, and innovation. The implementation of evidence-based policy and programs can serve as a source of continual renewal of social welfare in the United States.

Since its deployment with the passage of the Social Security Act of 1935, the welfare state has become embedded in the American experience. It represents a public institution by which citizens are ensured protection against poverty, unemployment, illness, disability, and discrimination, and has become embedded in the American experience. At variance from the ideal of the classical welfare state that emerged in Europe, American lawmakers crafted a welfare state that included shared governance between the federal government and the states, differentiated benefits according to social insurance and public assistance, and incorporated nonprofit and commercial providers. Subsequently, the American welfare state generated any number of contradictions which provided the grist for the policy debate about optimizing social welfare in the U.S. Empirical research on the actual performance of social programs as experienced by citizens has, by comparison to the ideological disputes, only recently become available. The interaction of these features is essential to comprehending social welfare in the United States. In contrast to its characterization as a stolid, public institution, the American welfare state has been promiscuously adaptable and is likely to be more so in the future. This is assured by the nation’s civic character as an open society as well as its political economy as democratic-capitalist, features represented by voluntary, nonprofit organizations as well as for-profit firms. The ambit of the American welfare state would be circumscribed by an extant infrastructure of public social programs, a vigorous debate about the proper role of the private versus public sectors, and data demonstrating that program performance is often inconsistent at best.

Click here to read the full paper.